Skip to main content

It's a Publish or Perish World Revisited


Yesterday, I published my take on the Sokal Squared scandal on my page at Medium, and was surprised that it got a bump from the editors, “Our curators just read your story, It’s a Publish or Perish World, that you submitted for review. Based on its quality, they selected it to be recommended to readers interested in Education across our homepage, app, topic page, and emails.”  While the recommendation immediately meant more people read my story than the one I posted a week before (six reads vs. none), what really caught me off guard was a related story I read this morning on The Daily Beast.  While I didn’t specifically cite the Quillette story referenced, I did send the link to it to my wife as an  example of my sense that the lefts’ obsession with identity was alienating people that should be politically aligned with our larger goals.  Yet, in reading the Daily Beast article, I realized I’d been hoaxed (a direct response to the Sokal Story) as well.  The story I linked to my wife was a hoax.  The person was not who he said he was and the publication that diligently reported on the Sokal Squared scandal was guilty of what Peter Boghossian et al accused “grievance studies” journals of.  It was this boomerang of people being blinded by ideology and not exercising due diligence before putting things out on the media. 
                Strangely, I’m still not sure this is really much of a story.  My take is that if people want to be bad actors and submit articles to websites or journals, is it really a surprise that the editors’ bias might cause them to go full steam ahead with publication?  Isn’t this what Post-Modernism (the Right’s favorite bug-a-boo) argues?  Yes, these publications are “guilty” of not exercising due diligence before going to “press,” and maybe they really are “guilty” of publishing pieces that support their ideology. But the hoax, in both cases, doesn’t prove the second point, while it clearly proves the first point.  It also proves a third point as well.  If you are a bad actor and want to hoax or sting a publication, you can. 
Using the ideology of the editors against them is really no different than a poet reading poems published in The New Yorker before submitting there.   Creative writers know that you pick your submission based on what has been published there already.  Why do we think it’d be any different in the non-fiction world?  Do we still hold on to the idea that objectivity is a thing?  And, yes, I know that many people argue that the Scientific Method and Research Ethics deliberately puts measures in place to control for bias.  Ultimately though, aren’t we all taking some beliefs and actions based on faith or probability?   Even the most controlled experiment “free” from bias and replicated many times, may not be all that applicable because out here beyond the confines of the lab we can’t control for every variable so things may not exactly work out like they’re supposed to.   
                I think we’ve reached a tipping point.  We have to understand that sometimes we are taking positions and actions based on the best available data.  Waiting for and controlling for every possible variable may mean we don’t take any action at all.  Isn’t that what is motivating the US government from taking any real action on climate change?  Oh my, there’s still not a hundred percent certainty that we’re experiencing human caused climate change so, therefore, let’s not do anything at all.  We may never be able get to the “truth” but can’t we acknowledge that at the same time we say, “We need to take some action.”  Why do we continue, to use a cliché, to make “the perfect the enemy of the good.”  So to all the people who want to jump on this bandwagon or that bandwagon because their conclusions fit with what they believe why don’t we take a step back and say, “I could be wrong and you could be right, but let’s at least be open to what each other is saying so that we can work together on making things better.”  It’s not that we don’t have enough facts or statistics to support one side or the other, it’s that we keep thinking that facts and statistics are the only thing that will win the argument.  And they don’t. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Peregrinating the Albuquerque Bosque

  The Map. Overview: Starting in the San Juans in Colorado, the Rio Grande "is the twenty-second longest river in the world and the fourth or fifth longest in North America" ( Texas State Historical Society ).  While the river is characterized by the area it flows through, the river from Elephant Butte Dam to the south to Cochiti Dam in the north is called the Middle Rio Grande.  And in the middle of the middle Rio Grande is the roughly 20 plus miles that flows through Albuquerque.  From an airplane, the Rio Grande is a brown ribbon bordered a green ribbon.  That green ribbon is the Bosque .  I've always been fascinated really exploring an area, getting a sort of overview of an area then drilling down to really get it.  It's led to me hiking the Sandias from end to end and then hiking outlying trails multiple times, biking all the trails in the Cedro Peak area because someone put them on a map, trying different routes to get to ...

Peregrinating the Albuquerque Bosque-the Autumnal Equinox edition

Overview:   In June, around the Summer Solstice, my wife, my dog, and I set out to hike the Albuquerque Bosque from end to end over two days .  It was well over a hundred degrees and after starting later than expected we didn't make it as far the first day as we hoped.  But we did make it. Now, three months later, around the Autumnal Equinox, we set out to do it again.  Our route was slightly different and, with the weather being a lot more pleasant, broke the day into a thirteen mile day and a five mile day:  eighteen total miles from Valle de Oro National Wildlife Refuge to the Alameda Bridge right on the border between Albuquerque and Corrales. The things we wanted to do differently this time were pretty straightforward:  1) don't get lost at the south terminus and get into the bosque sooner, and 2) walk even more on the westside.  So, the route was a follows:  we'd walk on the east side from Valle de Oro to the Rio Bravo Bridge, cro...

Top 10 Jazz Albums

So, Mindy and I have been on a Jazz kick for the better part of 3 months now.  At first, it was just listening to what we knew and then it moved into just kinda cherry picking, but finally, it was just too overwhelming, so I broke down and bought The Penguin Guide to Jazz Recordings  .   So, after using the book and listening, I assigned a homework assignment.   What are your Top 10 Jazz Albums of all time (so far)?  As much as possible try and pick albums and avoid picking compilations or "best of" albums because they are more often than not just compilations of singles and not complete works of art on their own like a good album tries to be. So here's my list: 1.  In a Special Way -Miles Davis.  There really is no words to describe how awesome this album is.   Though the critics define it as "Fusion," it really was "Fusion" before people knew what that was.  And while it was recorded ensemble (unlike a lot recording whe...