Skip to main content

Whose Side are You On?


When did UNM become no better than a banana republic hiding behind the buzzwords of "safety" and lurking behind "proper permits?"   Sure, Karen Wentworth can hide behind University policy as justification for the removal of the protesters but weren't the protesters camping out on university property the whole week before?   So I guess the policy is only there when the University gets tired of the protesters?   How convenient.  I guess I’m supposed to be soothed by this bit of “bureaucratese” and disregard the fact that UNM is selectively enforcing its own policy like some sort of banana republic.  If UNM is going to hide behind policy than they should’ve done it last week.   

Now I’m supposed to be soothed by this quote, ““Central (Avenue) is just not a safe place,” she said.  Really?   Central Avenue is not safe?   Did it suddenly get more safe when the protesters we’re on the corner of Central and University?  

Finally, in what struck me as sort of “Kafkaesque” its reported, “Wentworth said protesters applied for a convention permit when they should have applied for an outdoor activities permit.”  Oh my, they got the wrong paperwork?   Would they have been allowed to stay had they gotten the right paperwork? 

Here’s my guess as to what happened.   Protesters camp out on University and Central for what administrators hope is a couple of days.  It turns out that it lasts a bit longer so the university asks if they would be willing to relocate from the pristine environs at University and Central to a more trodden location next to the bookstore.  The protesters relocate and when they don’t disperse after a couple of really crappy, rainy days, the administration starts to get a bit worried.  What if the protesters just don’t go away?  Haven’t we humored them long enough?   Haven’t they made their point?   Okay, well let’s get rid of them.   Let’s do it at midnight so no other students/community members see it.  Let’s hide behind the monster bureaucracy we’ve created and say it’s not “safe,” and it’s not “sanitary.”  Really?

So this is how much UNM supports the first amendment?   We’re here to educate and help create civil minded citizens but when it gets a tad bit ugly, let’s just dispense with it.   Here’s my suggestion.   You support the first amendment but you don’t want people defecating on the lawn, put up a Port-a-Pot.   You support the first amendment but you don’t want a ramshackle “shanty town” to make UNM look like a third world village, put up those nice, neat Lobo tents so the protesters can be protected from the elements.   There are numerous other ways UNM could show its support for the protesters, but as it is, they’ve shown that they support the banks, the corporations, the very elements that have caused a budgetary hardship on every department at UNM.   You’re either support the protesters or you support the banks.   Whose side are you on?
Don McIver

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"That's Scaughtland for ya!"

The United Kingdom Up at the top of that map, basically the top half, is a tiny nation with a big footprint.  With roughly the same population as Minnesota, Scotland has a land mass the size of South Carolina, yet there are more people in the United States that have Scottish and/or Scotch-Irish ancestry than live in Scotland. My family is one of those. In the course of growing up, I was indoctrinated to celebrate my Scottish ancestry (primarily by my grandmother but we'll talk about that later).      So a year ago, my wife took a trip with her mother to Japan.  I looked at the pictures that she posted, and when I'd talk to her on the phone, I noticed something.  She was happy.  This is not to say she's always unhappy, but this was different.  She was having a good time, engaged in the world, curious, and happy-like no matter what the challenge.  And traveling to Japan with her mother posed some interesting challenge...
Post a Comment
Read more

Keith Jarrett: The Koln Concert and What it says about Creativity

Life is about listening.   Sometimes what life is saying comes at you in in strange ways.   On Friday, I was reading this story on Salon.com and it mentioned that few jazz musicians have the same clout as they once did.  Of the few who still draw considerable audiences, it mentioned Keith Jarrett .   I don't know Keith Jarrett, but I've been trying to school myself on jazz for the better part of a year now.   Since I'm relatively new to this jazz thing, I want to make sure I'm really listening to what people think of as "great."   With that in mind, I bought a book:   The Penguin Guide to Jazz Recordings .   Under Keith Jarrett they mention the album,  The Koln Concert as his best album (part of any enthusiasts' "Core Collection").   So, when I saw the album while perusing Mecca Records in ABQ, I knew I had to buy it.   Life was talking. The Koln Concert  (So, go ahead and ...
2 comments
Read more

Volume 7 & 8 of What if the Beatles never broke up?

 With the commercial success of Band on the Run and Venus and Mars , Paul had all but erased the demon of being "merely" the cute Beatle.  He had his own success, with Wings, and could stand his own compositions up next to what he did in the Beatles.   Wings at the Speed of Sound went to number one on the strength of "Let "Em In" and "Silly Love Songs," which I chose not to include because in this project the critique that lead to its creation may not have been an issue.  Instead, I include his great, "With A Little Luck" that came out in 1978 on   London Town and the great single "Mull of Kyntyre," which is so damn Scottish its easy to see why it was a hit in Great Britain but no where else. I certainly don't agree with the contemporary critics who characterized George Harrison's Thirty Three and 1/3 as his "best release since All Things Must Pass."   In fact I think the earlier releases of Living In The Materi...
Post a Comment
Read more